At 21:33 24/06/1998 +0000, Dave_K9NX wrote:
>(snip) A better approach might be to calculate the "filtered"
>R+jX from the measured Z and SWR reading then if you know the
>values of the components in the filter run that through
>"backwards" through Radio Designer or some other circuit
>simulation program to get the exact R+jX. This eliminates the
>need to have a wide range of R, L and C comp on hand to do the
>substitution...
This is just what I proposed. I never suggested physical substitution,
because that is what programs like Radio Designer are supposed to free us
from!
Perhaps I didn't make this point clear enough. Thanks for the clarification.
Peter VK3APN
pnesbit@melbpc.org.au
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
|