Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

[uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>]

Thanks Frank
These numbers speak volumes:

14        55
15        47
16         5

I've seen you here many times :

http://www.reversebeacon.net/dxsd1/dxsd1.php?f=3

But I never heard it even once ..

For all my CQ WW I don't remember such weak conditions (  (towards NA).




---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua

donovanf@erols.com писал 2020-12-02 09:29:
> Hi Nick,
>
> W3LPL was multi-single, we spent very limited time
> on Topband except to chase multipliers.
>
> We worked 160 QSOs, 21 Zones and 70 countries on Topband
>
> Conditions appeared to be normal to Europe but poor
> on paths crossing the auroral zone such as Zone 16
>
> There was significantly less Topband activity than in recent years,
> perhaps because both 80 and 40 meters were excellent all night.
>
> Zone     QSOs01 1 02 1
> 03 1 04 16
> 05 12
> 06 1
> 07 2
> 08 6
> 09 4
> 10 1 11 1
> 13 1
> 14 55 15 47 16 5 20 4
> 21 1
> 31 1 33 4 35 2 40 1
>
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
>
> -------------------------
>
> FROM: "uy0zg" <uy0zg@mksat.net>
> TO: donovanf@erols.com
> CC: topband@contesting.com, "Topband"
> <topband-bounces+uy0zg=mksat.net@contesting.com>
> SENT: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 6:32:05 PM
> SUBJECT: Re: Topband: FW:  CQWW a bust this year
>
> Hi
>
> Frank
>
> May I ask how many QSOs with zone 16 did you have on 160 meters in
> this
> CQ WW ?
>
> ---
> Nick, UY0ZG
> http://www.topband.in.ua
>
> donovanf@erols.com писал 2020-12-01 20:20:
> > Of course Lee is absolutely correct.
> >
> >
> > Many 160 DXers who have had difficulty with receiving antennas
> > have given up too easily during the troubleshooting process.
> >
> >
> > 73
> > Frank
> > W3LPL
>   Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector