To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: the ionosphere in the sky |
From: | Carl <k9la@gte.net> |
Reply-to: | k9la@arrl.net |
Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:19:02 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Tom W8JI saidThe ionosphere in the sky is apparently different than an ionosphere on paper That's a fair statement. The ionosphere 'in the sky' varies quite a bit on a day-to-day basis. This day-to-day variation is due to solar radiation influences, solar wind influences, and neutral atmosphere influences. From what I've read, it appears that solar radiation influences are a small part of this total day-to-day variation - unfortunately this is the one we understand the best compared to the other two. The ionosphere 'on paper' is a monthly median model, which is what is used in our propagation prediction software (VOACAP, W6ELProp, Proplab Pro, etc). It is statistical over a month's time frame. For example, we can say that 10m will be open on 17 days of the month to our target on a certain date at a certain time at a certain smoothed sunspot number. But we have a real tough time identifying which specific days of the month those will be. Simply put, we do not have a daily model of the ionosphere. We can observe what's happening daily, but as of yet we can only statistically predict what's happening over a much longer time frame. Carl K9LA _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: re: Question re 5Z4, Roger Parsons |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: The whereabouts of VS6DO(paul bailey), paul bailey |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: re: Question re 5Z4, Roger Parsons |
Next by Thread: | Topband: The whereabouts of VS6DO(paul bailey), paul bailey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |