Shelby Summerville wrote:
>Chuck Sudds wrote: "PLEASE, respond to QSL's sent via "snail mail" as some
>of us are still trying to confirm 160M WAS."
>
>And for those "still trying to confirm 160M WAS", don't forget to send an
>SASE for those cards you need!
>
>C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>
>
>
QSLing debates have always interested me....... it seems simple enough.
Respond in kind. It used to be snail mail only. Then bureaus came to
be, a variation on snail mail Now LOTW and eQSL. While SASE's are
appreciated courtesy dictates an eventual reply. My personal take is an
SASE I get it out ASAP. Sorry about the acronyms... too many years with
the US Govt. Huge amounts of info are shared on QRZ.com as to QSLing
preferences. Let the rest of you figure out how you want to do it but
as for me, I'll QSL in kind especially on topband, since it is still the
gentlemans band.... and gentleman go out of their way to be generous and
helpful. My .02
73
Buddy
KC4WQ
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|