Nm7m@aol.com wrote:
>Friends in Radioland,
>
>Earlier, I cited the fact that 160 DXing generally improves when the flux
>of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) DECREASES. This is shown on reviewing
>distance L vs GCR records in 160 meter logs
>
>In addition, statistical analysis of DX contacts by SP5EWY shows that
>propagation from Poland to North America is slightly better than from W7LR
>in Montana to Europe, This is probably due to the rich soil on the banks
>of the Mississippi River.
>
>On the other hand, propagation from ZS4TX to North America, largely over
>sea water, is better than from ZS4TX to Scandinavia, over jungle, dry desert
>and the rocky Alps.
>
>It is hoped at these analyses may be extended to East and West of JAPAN
>but suitable logs for 2003 to 2007 have not been obtained. If you can
>suggest a candidate, please contact me at Nm_7m@aol,com_ (mailto:Nm7m@aol,com)
>
>
Hi Bob,
I don't quite understand the relationship between SP5EWY's DX results to
North America and rich soil on the banks of the Mississippi. Wouldn't
good soil around the Mississippi only benefit a small subset of North
American stations contacting SP5EWY?
Thanks,
Mike W4EF...........
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|