To: | Topband Reflector <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: AAARRRAAGH ##$!@@!! |
From: | "Joshua M. Arritt" <jarritt@vt.edu> |
Date: | Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:17:33 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Poor RX situations (unsuitable antenna, local QRN, etc) can sometimes render the offending ham unsuspecting, and unaware of his trespasses. It seems a bit out-of-place to stress the importance of "RF hearing" to the "RF deaf", however.... but perhaps this is precisely the message such folks (the accidentals) need? For the intentional QRMers, it seems unlikely that anything short of Enforcement should suffice. 73, - Josh / KF4YLM _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Trees And RF - Suggested Test, Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: AAARRRAAGH ##$!@@!!, Dan Zimmerman N3OX |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: AAARRRAAGH ##$!@@!!, Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: AAARRRAAGH ##$!@@!!, Dan Zimmerman N3OX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |