Does anyone have a reference to the technological basis for the alleged
superiority of the "moebius loop" over other amplified, broadband
"shielded" loops? In other words, what makes this antenna any better
than a shielded loop (even a multi turn loop within a shield) where the
barrow band "coupling loop" has been replaced by a broadband balanced
input preamplifier?
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2/12/2011 3:21 PM, Phil LaMarche wrote:
> I'm considering the purchase of the Pixel Shielded Active Broadband Magnetic
> "Moebius Loop" Antenna. I intend to put it on the roof of my stilt home
> with a small rotor. It will be fed into the 2nd antenna input of my K3. My
> other 160 antenna is a 70 ft shunt fed tower, which works very well. Any
> experience out there with this antenna? The owner did a big sell on it at
> the Orlando Hamfentsion. Cost is 399.99. Any comments, please.
> www.pixelsatradio.com
>
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> Philip LaMarche
>
>
>
> LaMarche Enterprises, Inc
>
> <mailto:Phil@LaMarcheEnterprises.com> Phil@LaMarcheEnterprises.com
>
> <http://www.LaMarcheEnterprises.com> www.LaMarcheEnterprises.com
>
>
>
> 727-944-3226
>
> 727-937-8834 Fax
>
> 727-510-5038 Cell
>
>
>
> <http://www.w9dvm.com> www.w9dvm.com
>
>
>
> K3 #1605
>
>
>
> CCA 98-00827
>
> CRA 1701
>
> W9DVM
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|