To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity |
From: | Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:34:57 -0400 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 10/24/2012 06:37 PM, Mike Waters wrote: So according to your tests, the ~5/8 wave tower was always inferior to the 190' tower, no matter what the distance was? That is very interesting, And I have little doubt all your towers had sufficient radials under them. :-) What do you think about 120' vs 190' ? Ever do any tests like that? I wonder if it would be an idea to try these ideas on 40m. That way it could be tested with much antennas small enough multiple people might be willing to set them up for testing. _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity, Herb Schoenbohm |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity, Richard Fry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity, Mike Waters |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity, Mike Armstrong |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |