To: | Topband <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Vertical vs. Shunt-Fed Tower |
From: | Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | n2ic@arrl.net |
Date: | Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:19:51 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
After many frustrating experiences with unwelcome interaction between
various 160 antennas and towers, I am thinking about going back to
basics by removing all the other 160 wires, and shunt feeding the 110
foot tower (which has a number of yagis on it). All else being equal
(such as ground system), are there reasons why a shunt-fed tower would
work differently than a vertical of the same height, on an insulated base ?
73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: The Stew Perry TopBand Distance Challenge 2012, Lew Sayre |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: 160m ARRL contest, Martin |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Vertical vs. Shunt-Fed Tower and Detuning, Ryszard Tymkiewicz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |