To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Submerging variable caps in oil as substitute for vacuum variables |
From: | Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:42:20 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
The omega match for my shunt fed tower uses two 300 uF roughly 3000-volt
variables I bought from Henry radio a few years ago. I think
occasionally about running more than 100 watts on 160, but the cost of
the vacuum variables is a real issue. February QST has an article on
using mineral oil immersion to increase the voltage capability of
variables in a 600M amplifier. The article does not include any hi-pot
data, but indicates that the maximum capacitance went up a lot.
Opinions? -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com. For spots, please go to your favorite ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Chassis Bonding, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Submerging variable caps in oil as substitute for vacuum variables, Shoppa, Tim |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions, Björn SM0MDG |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Submerging variable caps in oil as substitute for vacuum variables, Shoppa, Tim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |