Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: To JT or not to JT

To: Topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: To JT or not to JT
From: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 13:51:27 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Right!

When we see some of issues that are popping up now, such as remotes being used outside ones entity but claimed as inside, to argue about which mode is worthy or not, is misguided.

In addition, is not like 160 is a crowded band. :^)

73 de Vince, VA3VF

On 2017-05-20 1:25 PM, rick darwicki via Topband wrote:
There is no question......... get them anyway you can mixed.

If you want an all CW, SSB or Digital, go for it but don't belittle guys that 
don't have 500 ft. beverages in 6 directions and full size 4 squares for 
transmitting.

I have 91 countries on topband with an S-7/8 noise level and if it takes JT to 
get the last 9, so be it, then I'll worry about picking up the others on CW 
later.
We don't hear whining that the all CW guys haven't gotten with the 21st century 
and don't know how to use modern technology, it the AM/SSB flap all over again.
Next thing you know people will start complaining "he worked him in June, not the 
REAL DXer's season" hi hi hi  Rick 
N6PE======================================================================
There are more planes in the ocean than submarines in the sky


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>