Re: Topband: FCC regulations

To:	topband@contesting.com
Subject:	Re: Topband: FCC regulations
From:	Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:32:14 -0500
List-post:	<topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>

It's apparent that some people have a very "creative" way of interpreting FCCregulations. If

you want to operate YOUR station within the law, read and understand Part 97. 
Do NOT
believe what anyone tells you. They are usually WRONG!

73, Roger


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Topband: Strange propagation, Jim Murray via Topband Re: Topband: Strange propagation, Herbert Schoenbohm Re: Topband: Strange propagation, Raoul Coetzee via Topband Re: Topband: Strange propagation, mstangelo Re: Topband: Strange propagation, Louis Parascondola via Topband Re: Topband: Strange propagation, John Kaufmann Topband: FCC regulations circa 1960's, Tom W8JI Re: Topband: FCC regulations circa 1960's, Louis Parascondola via Topband Re: Topband: FCC regulations circa 1960's, Mike Waters Re: Topband: FCC regulations, Roger D Johnson <= Re: Topband: FCC regulations circa 1960's, John Frazier Re: Topband: Strange propagation, Charles Moizeau Re: Topband: Strange propagation, Louis Parascondola via Topband Topband: strange propagation, lmlangenfeld@tds.net Re: Topband: strange propagation, Steve Baughn Re: Topband: strange propagation, Herbert Schoenbohm Re: Topband: strange propagation, Louis Parascondola via Topband

Previous by Date:	Re: Topband: Any way to check isolation transformer for FCP, Andy - YL2QN
Next by Date:	Topband: 160 meters late 1940's- early 1950's, K1FZ-Bruce
Previous by Thread:	Re: Topband: FCC regulations circa 1960's, Mike Waters
Next by Thread:	Re: Topband: FCC regulations circa 1960's, John Frazier
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]