Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data)

To: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data)
From: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:11:23 +0000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
“Wes cut his radial length to match the vertical L section height (see N6LF
> reference).  He didn't reduce the number of radials.”

I didn’t think it was the “shortening” OF the length of the radials that would 
improve performance e.g. going from 10 125’ radials to 10 55’ radials (in the 
case of a 55’ vertical); rather, it was the fact that 10x 125’ of wire could be 
better employed to increase the number of radials, albeit resulting in shorter 
radials, that decreases the ground loss (since most is nearer the base of the 
vertical).  If I’m correct, then shortening a given number of radials should 
decrease loss or improve performance....

73,

Bob AA6VB 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>