There's nothing in the CQ contest rules about not CQing in the "window." They
just say it should be used for intercontinental QSOs only:
http://cq-amateur-radio.com/160%20Contest%20Rules%202004%20111503.pdf
There's nothing in the ARRL contest rules about not CQing in the "window." They
just say it should be used for intercontinental QSOs only:
http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2003/160-Meters.html
If no one called CQ, how would anyone make any contacts?
For stations on other continents, W/VE is the DX! So why shouldn't we CQ here
too to attact DX (but not answer any domestic calls nor North American DX, to
abide by the rules). The Europeans who are elbow-to-elbow CQing in the "window"
somehow are able to hear all the U.S. stations calling THEM, so what is the
point of having a window? They could be doing this anywhere in the band.
I personally feel a "window" is a waste of space and should be eliminated. The
"state of the art" -- improved receivers, transmitters, and antennas -- makes
transceive operation the most practical and spectrum-efficient use of the band.
Very few of my DX contacts in contests in recent years have been made in the
"DX Window." But I still seem to work quite a bit of DX -- including things in
the Pacific right through W5/W6/W7/W8/W9/W0 QRM.
I'd rather have that 5 kHz to help everyone spread out just a wee bit more to
alleviate the general QRM.
73 and HNY,
Jon AA1K
.At 05:15 PM 12/30/03, you wrote:
>I believe there are few problems with the way it is now .... VE and W/K can
>call in the window ... just not CQ. It is so handy to be able to zip up
>into the window and see how loud the DX is, and by that judge if a detailed
>S&P is warrented. Forcing Dx to listen outside the window would be a big
>mistake .... The QRM would be terrible. Like 75 meters in a SSB contest ...
>When the DX says listening on 3840 you transmit there no matter who you QRM.
>I like the idea of moving it down as it would solve the Left vs Right
>friction. Europe and Japan are open at different times so it would probably
>work fine. The big problem will be to change something that is as fragile as
>the current "Window".
>John
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tom Baugh" <tombaugh@discoverynet.com>
>To: "jbattin" <jbattin@msn.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:26 AM
>Subject: Re: Topband: DX window
>
>
>> John,
>> I'm in favor of it as well and honor it to a fault but the issue is "who
>is
>> the DX"?
>> If you're in US.. non US is DX if you're in EU Non EU is DX there needs to
>> be a better plan like NA doesn't call in 1830-35 and EU doesn Call in
>35-40
>> or some such thing. Otherwise nobody can call..
>>
>> Tom
>> AE9B
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "jbattin" <jbattin@msn.com>
>> To: "Ron Feutz" <feutz@wctc.net>; <topband@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 1:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: Topband: DX window
>>
>>
>> > Although it does not solve problems everywhere, I do not know why is so
>> > hard for Stateside and Canada not to call CQ in the 30-35 window. It is
>> > great to have one place on the band where the DX is not under a CQ'er.
>> Over
>> > the week-end there were numerous times a DX station was calling CQ on or
>> > close to a US CQ'er and when I would call the DX, the CQ'er would go
>crazy
>> > with QRL. I think it is natural to lose a CQ frequency from time to time
>> in
>> > favor of giving the DX station a break. We should re-enforce the 30-35
>> > window while it is still common practice.
>> > John K9DX
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Ron Feutz" <feutz@wctc.net>
>> > To: <topband@contesting.com>
>> > Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:03 AM
>> > Subject: Re: Topband: DX window
>> >
>> >
>> > > Not sure how anything you say applies. It is expected, and has been
>> > common
>> > > practice forever, for NA stations to call and work DX on their calling
>> > > frequency in the window, unless the DX specifies otherwise. No one
>has
>> > > suggested that the FCC mandate a window. It has always been by
>> > Gentlemen's
>> > > Agreement.
>> > >
>> > > At 10:36 AM 12/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>> > > >First of all, the key is if DX CQ's in the "window"
>> > > >they have to QSX OUT of the window.
>> > > >
>> > > >Secondly, the FCC will never mandate a "DX window."
>> > > >
>> > > >Good DX on 160 to all in 2004!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >At 11:32 PM 12/28/2003, you wrote:
>> > > >>Topbanders,
>> > > >>
>> > > >>A window is absolutely vital to me. Under usual conditions, with
>the
>> > > >>auroral oval cutting off most EU and JA DX, I need a place to go and
>> see
>> > > >>if anything is coming thru. In the Stew, US stations for the most
>> part
>> > > >>stayed out of the old window, 1830-35, and it was pretty useful for
>> > > >>me. I did ask one US station to move, as he was calling CQ on top
>of
>> a
>> > > >>G. I quickly explained this and he answered OK SRI.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>All the debate over who is DX is just a bunch of blah blah blah to
>> > > >>me. Why can't we just go back to the Gentlemen's Agreement and
>leave
>> > > >>that chunk of band for non-NA stations to CQ in?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>73,
>> > > >>
>> > > >>Ron - WA9IRV
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>_______________________________________________
>> > > >>Topband mailing list
>> > > >>Topband@contesting.com
>> > > >>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>> > > >
>> > > >73, Craig Clark, K1QX
>> > > >
>> > > >RADIOWARE AND RADIO BOOKSTORE
>> > > >PO BOX 209
>> > > >RINDGE NH 03461
>> > > >603 899 6957
>> > > >WWW.RADIO-WARE.COM
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >_______________________________________________
>> > > >Topband mailing list
>> > > >Topband@contesting.com
>> > > >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Topband mailing list
>> > > Topband@contesting.com
>> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Topband mailing list
>> > Topband@contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Topband mailing list
>Topband@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|