At 04:05 AM 2008-12-07, Fred Wagner KQ6Q wrote:
>My antenna (don't laugh, I live in a mobile home) is a Valor
>PHF-160B magmounted on a metal roof, with a couple of radials - 50'
>or so, fed through a DX Engineering MM-1.
>Since proper sized radials are not.possible, I'm wondering if would
>radiate more effectively if I used a Hamstick Dipole bracket, and
>set up as a vertical dipole with two Valor PHF-160B's on a pole so
>the entire assembly was above the roofline ?
>I use a Hamstick dipole on 40, horizontally, with excellent results
>- fed off the 25ohm tap on the MM-1 that feeds the 160m whip on its
>12.5 ohm port.
>
>Would the Vertical Dipole with two Valor whips be worth a try ?
Fred,
I was skeptical that there would be any benefit to the vertical
dipole configuration with two 160m mobile whips, but after modeling
this, it appears that there is a 3 dB improvement.
I modeled the roof of your 24' x 56' mobile home roof with a 4' x 4'
grid elevated by 10 feet and put the mobile whip in the center. I
assumed that the coil in the Valor whip had a Q of 400. This
configuration produces a gain of about -18.5 dBi (about 3 S-units
below a full size 1/4 wl antenna with a fair ground system).
I suspect the coil Q is closer to 200, since this produces a
bandwidth near the 12 kHz specified by the manufacturer. However,
this would also give a feedpoint impedance closer to 25 ohms, which
appears to be higher than what you are seeing. The gain would be
lower, of course. Even though there is some disagreement here, it
doesn't invalidate the relative results of the model.
Adding a second identical whip and raising it so the bottom tip is 2
feet above the roof produces a gain of -15.3 dBi. The bandwidth is
unchanged (not unexpected, since the loading coils primarily
determine this). The feed impedance doubles, so you would have to
deal with matching this (a hairpin match would be a suitable and
inexpensive approach). You should run the feedline away from the
dipole perpendicular for a bit to reduce coupling. It would also be
a really good idea to use a choke (current) balun to decouple the
feedline shield so it doesn't act like a radial of sorts (which it
probably is doing now).
However, from the models, it appears that an even better (and
cheaper) approach would be to just raise the base of the antenna and
leave it as a monopole. Raising the whip by 8 feet using a metal
mast increases the gain to -11.2 dBi. Again, the bandwidth is
essentially the same, since the loading coil still rules. The base
feed Z goes up about 25%. There is nothing stopping you from using a
longer mast section and getting even higher efficiency and higher
feed Z (other than mechanical limits or deed restrictions, etc.) It
appears that the feedpoint can either be at the junction of the whip
with the top of the mast or at the bottom of the mast (with the whip
shorted to the top of the mast and a suitable insulator at the bottom
of the mast). The gain and feed Z are similar in either case. Your
radials would connect at the bottom of the mast. If the elevated
feed is used, the feedline should be taped or zip-tied to the mast
and run to the bottom of the mast.
I suspect your mobile home and the two 50 foot radials are a fair
elevated ground system. I don't think the fact that the roof and
radials are less than 1/4 wl is a significant issue since you
apparently can tune out any reactance by tweaking the mobile
whip. One would hope that your mobile home is grounded to a ground
rod for electrical safety. This may not be the ultimate RF ground,
but it will serve to increase the extent of your ground system.
Let me know if you have any questions.
73, Terry N6RY
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|