Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Reply-to: Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 12:08:58 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
The feedpoint connection, in all cases of vertical antennas, whether the system is shunt fed or series fed, or even if it is an end-fed half wave, ties one feed terminal to the ground or counterpoise system. It has to be that way, and the current out into that counterpoise (whatever the counterpoise is) has to be equal to the common mode current at the junction flowing up into the radiator.

The link below leads to a NEC4 comparison of a 1/4WL vertical monopole using four 1/4WL radial wires at 90-deg horizontal intervals. In one case the radials are buried. In the other case they (and the monopole) are elevated 1 meter above the earth, and not connected to the earth by any metallic path. Applied power in both cases is 100 watts, and earth conductivity in both cases is 5 mS/m, d.c.5.

The surface wave fields at 0.1 km from these two configurations differ by about 1.15 dB, which means that their radiated powers differ by about 30%.

If the total energy flowing into the monopole system with buried radials is dictated only by its hard-wired connection through the transmission line back to the transmitter, then what is accounting for the reduction of its radiated power?

http://s20.postimg.org/453nz5vn1/160_M_QTR_WV_MONOPOLE_Flds.jpg

R. Fry
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>