To: | "a Topband COL" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: 160M inverted L, 1/4 wave vs 3/8 wave? |
From: | "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <nz4o@tampabay.rr.com> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:57:21 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Ed over the years I have experimented with 3/8-1/2 wave inverted L's/T's on 160 meters with success. I published a website about it at http://www.wcflunatall.com/nz4o9.htm . 73 & GUD DX, Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O Lakeland, FL, USA nz4o@arrl.net NZ4O Amateur & SWL Radio Autobiography: http://www.nz4o.org _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Fw: Re: Coax Choke Balun, Russ Tobolic |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: A plea for antenna help from a fledgling 160m Op!, Guy Olinger K2AV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160M inverted L, 1/4 wave vs 3/8 wave?, Edward Swynar |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Remove/reduce RF in control cables, Gerard Jendraszkiewicz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |