>From: "Dave Bowker"
>
>Out of the 954 'Comments' and 'Reply to Comments' filed as of this posting,
>less than 30
>comments have addressed the issue of the lack of a narrow bandwidth
>segments on 160M! >Contrast this apathetic response by TopBanders to that
>of RM-10352 a few years ago!
>
>WHERE WERE YOU ON THIS ONE?
That issue has already been addressed and decided (rejected) by the FCC. It
is EXTREMELY rare for the Commission to reverse a decision once they have
enacted it into their rules. They have proclaimed many times that they will
reconsider a decision if and only if new issues can be presented that were
not addressed during the initial proceeding. It would be a total waste of
time to bring this up again to the FCC unless you can convince them that
something has drastically changed since they dismissed the original proposal
under RM-10352.
Don K4KYV
_______________________________________________________________
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout. Try it - you'll
like it.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|