RE: Topband: B.O.G. vs. regular beverage

["CHARLES HUTTON" <charlesh3@msn.com>]

Could you tell us what "not impressed with the performance" means? Did you 
lose a few dB's via loss and have a non-too-sensitive radio that couldn't 
dig things out? Did you feel that the nulls were smeared? F/B ratio not good 
enough? Beamwidth not narrow enough?

I can appreciate that a BOG is not always the equivalent of a regular 
Beverage, but it's a little unclear what drives your unhappiness.


Chuck (#2)



How did you test this?

> From: "W5PR" <W5PR@swbell.net>
> To: "'Ed Swynar'" <gswynar@durham.net>,"'D Andersen'" <w7dddd@msn.com>
> CC: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: Topband: B.O.G. vs. regular beverage
> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:43:38 -0500
>
> I tried a 1000 foot B.O.G. and was not impressed with the performance
> compared to the previous 650 foot standard beverage.  I will go to a 850
> foot 10 foot high beverage on temporary supports for CQWW.  (I have good
> ground.)
>
> Chuck W5PR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Swynar [mailto:gswynar@durham.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:24 AM
> To: D Andersen; Chuck Dietz
> Cc: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: B.O.G. vs. regular beverage
>
> Don,
>
> How long is your beverage at that height?
>
> ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "D Andersen" <w7dddd@msn.com>
> To: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
> Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: B.O.G. vs. regular beverage
>
>
> > Hi Chuck,
> >
> > I have tried a Beverage on the ground and found that the gain was to
> > low
> for
> > use without a pre-amp.  I elevated it 1 inch and the gain was almost
> > as
> good
> > as 10 feet and no pre-amp was needed.  I still use this antenna 1 inch
> high.
> > The velocity factor is changed so the Beverage produces a pattern as
> > if it was longer.  Another advantage is that it does not receive
> > terrestrial
> noise
> > very well.
> >
> > 73's,
> > Don, w7dd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
> > To: <topband@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:51 AM
> > Subject: Topband: B.O.G. vs. regular beverage
> >
> >
> > > I have to now use a temporary beverage to the NE.  I have 1000 feet.
> > >
> > > 1. I can put out 1000' of RG-59 on the surface of average ground to
> > > a termination, or
> > >
> > > 2. I can put out 1000' of bare wire at 10' off the ground on PVC
> > > posts
> to
> > > the same termination.
> > >
> > > I already have all the materials.
> > > I have a pre-amp for the BOG to equalize the level to the other
> beverages.
> > >
> > > Of course the BOG would be the ideal solution because I have a hose
> > > reel
> I
> > > can just wind it up on Sunday morning after the contest.
> > >
> > > Will the standard 10' high beverage perform better?
> > >
> > > Chuck W5PR
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Topband mailing list
> > > Topband@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Topband mailing list
> > Topband@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband