Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
From: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:10:05 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Ahhh, the social justice warriors (SJW) have arrived.  What do we do with
them?
Doug 

-----Original Message-----

Hear Hear!

Gary
KA1J

> I vote you take your contentious attitude somewhere else MIKE DURKIN
> 
> Cecil
> K5DL
> 
> Sent using recycled electrons.
> 
> > On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:07 AM, MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Come on Bill ...  did i say you did ?
> >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> > 
> > Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't
see that structure ... 
> > Id like to know what SDR was so poor.
> > 
> > SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old
woman) Flying Circus any one?
> > 
> > 
> >> From: baycock@mediacombb.net
> >> To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500
> >> 
> >> Mike--
> >> It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is.
> >> and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive.

> >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> >> Bill--W4BSG
> >> 
> >> -----Original Message----- 
> >> From: MIKE DURKIN
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM
> >> To: topband@contesting.com
> >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >> 
> >> If i must ....
> >> 
> >> Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate
signals 
> >> ...
> >> 
> >> That in its self has three problems ...
> >> 
> >> NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not

> >> apples to turds)
> >> poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)?
> >> insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull
SDR 
> >> that he built.
> >> 
> >> Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by
simply 
> >> omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering
radio 
> >> operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put
into the 
> >> SDR i guess.
> >> 
> >> And i worry about you Bill .... the word "SPAM" being an expletive in
your 
> >> vocabulary ...
> >> 
> >> I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this -- 
> >> 
> >> When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it
will 
> >> have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed.
> >> 
> >> how many samples per second are true overload .... and i mean overload
--  
> >> not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really
shouldn't put 
> >> forth an opinion as truth.
> >> 
> >> That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out
the 
> >> difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it
out, 
> >> if not again.
> >> 
> >> Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> From: baycock@mediacombb.net
> >>> To: patriot121@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> >>> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500
> >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -----Original Message----- 
> >>> From: MIKE DURKIN
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM
> >>> To: topband@contesting.com
> >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >>> 
> >>> SPAM !!!!!!
> >>> 
> >>> Mike--
> >>> Can you explain this opinion?
> >>> In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is
well
> >>> thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me.
> >>> Bill--W4BSG
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> ---
> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>> 
> >>> _________________
> >>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >> 
> >> _________________
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >                         
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>