Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L
From: Mark Lunday <wd4elg@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:23:12 +0000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
>>> The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the 
>>> time.  The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other 
times) when horizontal polarization can work better   Dave, W0FLS<<<

This conclusion regarding probability is supported through numerous 
observations over the years in various texts and documented in John Delvodere's 
"Low Band DXing" 5th Edition Chapter 14 Section 7.

But each installation is unique.  These are probabilistic forecasts (like the 
weather).

The important thing is to go into the experiment with realistic expectations 
and a priori knowledge of most-likely outcomes.  But by all means, experiment!  
Share your results!  We are all learning new things every day, especially about 
Top Band.

I will share my experience when I phased two dipoles on 80 meters, 20 feet high 
above average soil, as an experiment:  I presumed, based upon standard 
literature I had reviewed up until that point and 45 years of personal 
experience, that the installation would be a "ground warmer."  

Imagine my surprise when I was able to easily hear and work into EU running 
QRP!  I learned a lot from that experiment and VA2GU's assistance (although 
John Delvodere does discuss this type of antenna at the beginning of Chapter 12 
in the 5th Edition).  VA2GU has evaluated phased wires extensively and has 
collected data to confirm his conclusions (you can see his analysis on his 
QRZ.com web page.)  Alas, a storm brought the dipoles down and the tree 
supports with them.

Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
Greensboro, NC  FM06be
wd4elg@arrl.net
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
SKCC #16439  FISTS #17972  QRP ARCI #16497
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>