To: | "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>, topband <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 1 Nov 2014 21:51:15 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Thanks, Rick. But some of us are more interested in 160 meters than winning a contest. :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist < richard@karlquist.com> wrote: > > On 11/1/2014 7:34 PM, Mike Waters wrote: > >> I just tuned across the low end of 160, and nothing (except one RTTY >> signal)! Is my receiver broke? I expected to hear at least SOME CW. >> > > We have a saying in the Northern California Contest Club: > > If you're on 160 during SS, you are losing. > > Rick N6RK > President NCCC > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160?, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160?, Mike Waters |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160?, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160?, Mike Waters |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |