Dave,
I have a lot of faith in NEC and N6LF's work, also. But I think the testing
is required partly because we cannot successfully model Guy's folded
counterpoise in NEC to determine the changes in ground loss, etc.
I would love to remote-switch between a few elevated radials and an FCP
under an inverted-L here at my QTH.
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:21 AM, DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>wrote:
> Guy,
>
> why must we continually test NEC against measurements? The work by N6LF has
> shown great correlation between simulation and the real world.
>
> Those of us who design electronic circuits (including EM) in the world of
> computer simulation have great faith in the various programs and NEC-4 (and
> possibly NEC-2) should give us an adequate A-B comparison.
>
> Dave WX7G
>
_______________________________________________
Stew Perry Topband Distance Challenge coming on December 29th.
|