To: | Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:40:46 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Exactly, Bruce! I just posted this about polarization on 160: ham.stackexchange.com/a/8895/8717 I wondered about the inverted-L. My guess is that it had a poor ground system. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Jul 17, 2017 9:22 AM, "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net> wrote: There are always exceptions. A few years ago there was someone that had a inverted V that worked well for DX. It was found that it was feed with open wire feeders that acted as a vertical antenna with top loading. If your antenna works well be happy. Ham radio is a great hobby. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job, K1FZ-Bruce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job, Mike Waters |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job, K1FZ-Bruce |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job, Mike Waters |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |