To: | "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>, "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>, <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>, <n4zr@contesting.com>, <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Submerging variable caps in oil as substituteforvacuum variables |
From: | "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:38:52 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Very true but the RF is still in the oil "dielectric" from the coax connector to the hot end of the resistor. Not the same at all.Loss tangent is meaningless in the dummy load application because impedance is low (weak electric field). There is very little displacement current compared to current into the resistor. Loss tangent means everything in a capacitor in a coupling or tuning system, because displacement current is as high as or higher than the terminal current. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: oil-submerged variables, Gary Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Speking of Hardline, Wayne Kline |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Submerging variable caps in oil as substituteforvacuum variables, Shoppa, Tim |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Not seeing your posts?, Tree |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |