Okay guys - when email starts getting this specific and personal - the rest
of the list is really not interested in it.
Please take this debate off the list.
Thanks.
Tree
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
wrote:
> Guy and jim,
>
> No, I'm not missing anything -- did you miss my words "first
> approximation" in my description of the model? That model was a
> feasibility study, not intended or accepted (by me, at least) as a
> predictor of actual performance of an antenna on a building that we known
> nothing more than a few dimensions. You are missing my point, which is
> that, depending on the nature of the building roof and structure, a
> horizontal antenna MIGHT be a very good one, and is worth trying.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> On Tue,8/11/2015 12:08 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
>
>> No. You'd be missing the essential point which has to do with the "shape"
>> of the tool and whether it was remotely suited to the problem.
>>
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|