To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Lack of Activity |
From: | Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:59:24 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
There's activity and then there's "activity." I take it that "activity" in this discussion really means DX. It so happens that there's other kinds of operating going on on 160 m. besides DX chasing if you can tolerate the tedium and torture of an enjoyable ragchew with an ordinary ham nearby. As for DX, I imagine that all hams are going SK at the same rate everywhere, meaning that an entity with a ham population of 50 in 1980, now has a ham population of 5, with maybe one active on 160. 73 Rob K5UJ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: V84SAA SR report 15 Feb - ANd final schedules of operation, Brad Denison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: V84SAA SR report 15 Feb - ANd final schedules of operation, Jeff Blaine |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Lack of Activity, cqtestk4xs--- via Topband |
Next by Thread: | Topband: CW operators - do you prefer QSK?, Martin Kratoska |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |