To: | Topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? |
From: | Ken Claerbout <kenk4zw@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:54:14 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Most of you know where my heart is on this one. And there are some good suggestions for keeping the old school modes vibrant. While good intentioned, the idea of splitting up the DXCC award is going to be a wasted effort. I would argue remote operating has already changed the DXCC landscape in a major way. Whether it's good or bad is a personal thing. Technology is constantly changing. The DXCC program will never keep up. Get on the air. Do your thing. Have fun. When it ceases to be fun for me, then I know I'll move onto something else. Anyone up for a contest this weekend? 73 Ken K4ZW _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long), k8gg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long), Dave AA6YQ |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long), Steve Ireland |
Next by Thread: | Topband: FT8: Making it too easy?, DXer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |