To: | "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>, "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennasfor160??? |
From: | "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:19:44 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
It shouldnt be too hard for some to install a wire mesh of plastic coated
rabbit fencing below the antenna, after a few months the grass will grow
well past it allowing mowing.
I did a variation at another home in the 80's when 60+ on ground radials
didnt perform as expected using a 100' shunt fed tower with stacked
monobanders. Adding four 4' x 50' mesh strips over the radials and
connecting into them made a huge difference.
Carl KM1H----- Original Message ----- From: "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net> To: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>Cc: "Mike Waters" <mikewate@gmail.com>; "topband List" <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:32 PMSubject: Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennasfor160??? On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Charlie Cunningham < charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com> wrote:There's been a lot of work done in the broadcast industry using elevated radials to replace deteriorated buried radial fieldsthat shows that pretty clearly. It was published in some IEEE transactionssome years ago.Be careful not to extrapolate very specifically qualified broadcastexperience into ham radio. Originally FCC spec radials still make the close foreground earth appear VERY conductive, which is NOT an advantage one willhave putting up two or four radials over plain old dirt, unless one is talking about midwest USA 30 millisiemen super dirt. I have yet to hear about a ham who had 120 buried bare radials underneath his two raised radials. A ham is talking about two or four raised over plain dirt. Two or four over ugly North Carolina 2 millisiemen will be down, though one will need comparison RBN plots watching an entire 160contest to see it. It's not so far down though that you won't work happy DXwith it, but there is a power loss. 73, Guy. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3681/7024 - Release Date: 01/22/14 _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
Previous by Date: | Topband: K6MM helically wound vertical for top band, w9hak |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, David Raymond |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, Charlie Cunningham |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, Charlie Cunningham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |