Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Comparison of Vertical Arrays for Low Band Receiving

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Comparison of Vertical Arrays for Low Band Receiving
From: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 05:47:22 +0000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Congratulations Joel on a very fine paper on RX antennas and sharing you hard 
work.
 I enjoyed the read and the exceptional depth of your work. Matter of fact I 
have read it 3 times now!

Lee   K7TJR   OR


  
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces+lee=k7tjr.com@contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
w5znjoel@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 2:18 PM
To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Comparison of Vertical Arrays for Low Band Receiving

That's an important question, Jim.

A receive preamp is one of my favorite topics and one of the top 10 questions 
I'm asked by hams, regardless of whether it is for low band RX antennas or in 
the VHF and above region. The question is "Do I need a preamp?" to which I 
always respond "I don't know, do you?". Its not meant to be a snooty response 
but a valiant effort to get the person to study and learn about preamps and 
what one does in an antenna system or circuit.  The person can then determine 
why they do, or do not, need one and assess what is right for their situation. 
The one wavelength Beverages used at my station have sufficient gain, and 
adequate SNR that I don't believe one is necessary. 

As I noted in the paper, geographical areas differ and there are RX antenna 
designs that benefit from a preamp, but not all of them in all situations.

73 Joel W5ZN


-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces+w5znjoel=gmail.com@contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 2:58 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Comparison of Vertical Arrays for Low Band Receiving

On 1/14/2025 12:13 PM, w5znjoel@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks. No, I did not have preamps at the feed point of the Beverages.

Is the sensitivity of a one wavelength Beverage low enough that a preamp at the 
feedpoint is needed? Loss in decent coax is pretty low at 2 MHz, and where I 
live, electronic noise has gotten high enough that I can't imagine it being a 
limitation. My reversible one wavelength Beverages (one EU-VK, the other SA-JA) 
point to noisy homes facing EU and JA, so they've become next to useless.

My 8 acres are in a dense redwood forest, with terrain that varies by at least 
50 ft in elevation, so any of these vertical arrays are out of the question. I 
am finding some benefit from an array of two VE3DO loops spaced
5/8 wave, but one of them is quite close to the noisy EU home, and points at 
it. :)  I'm phasing it with an NCC-1, which allows me to shift the pattern 
between northern EU and New England.

73, Jim K9YC

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>