To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | TopBand: Poor 160 Conditions |
From: | eldridge@direct.ca (Bob Eldridge) |
Date: | Thu, 24 Dec 1998 12:20:00 -0800 |
> It's just a matter of people being there on both ends. I'll drink to that. The GPS data on 1819 kHz is often quite strong when the ZLs are snug in bed. Good conditions on 40 don't necessarily mean poor on 160. But it may seem that way when many 160 operators have gone to 40. Merry Christmas everybody. Bob VE7BS -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | TopBand: RE: Poor 160 Conditions, w8ji.tom |
---|---|
Next by Date: | TopBand: InRad FT1000MP Mod: Good for 160?, Jeffrey Maass |
Previous by Thread: | TopBand: SPAM??Fwd: [TowerTalk] A Funny Postcard!, Bruce Lallathin |
Next by Thread: | TopBand: InRad FT1000MP Mod: Good for 160?, Jeffrey Maass |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |