Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge

To: "'TopBand'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:08:19 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
The lowest loss cable I have here is 75 Ohm 1" General Cable Fused Disc; its under a differnt name these days. Mostly air with poly discs and used for the 200' runs for 10M, 2M, and 222 MHz.

For the 160/80 inverted vee it is 450' of regular foamed 3/4" 75 Ohm CATV hardline with a RG-11 jumper and plenty of ferrite to the feed point. Ive been using ferrite sleeve baluns since the mid 70's; I was introduced to them by the company I worked for who was building equipment for the joint CIA/DOD Tempest program.

The lowest loss cables have large, smooth conductors that are the maximum possible size for the cable impedance. Dielectric is largely meaningless, except as it might affect conductor size.

We can argue this point endlessly, but it will always come back to the conductors. The exception would be some horrible dielectric or operation way up above normal VHF/UHF with marginal dielectrics.

It is the way it is. The confusion probably occurs because dielectrics with more air allow a larger conductor to be used for a given cable diameter and impedance, it is not because the dielectric has less loss.



_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>