| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Low 160m dple - trash or treasure? |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:24:38 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 1/13/2025 6:44 AM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote: Has anyone used a low 160m dipole at only 25'? In Chicago, I end-fed a 80-40 dipole that had loading coils to cover the two bands, and that I had fed with some vintage KW twin-lead, using a wrought-iron fence that ran around the front of my lot. Running 100W, it worked 1,000 miles or so very well. Some time later, I learned that I'd fried the W2DU "balun" at the feedpoint, which was not designed for that application. :) This was before I'd begun (or even conceived) my work on common mode chokes. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Low 160m dple - trash or treasure?, Bill Lederer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Comparison of Vertical Arrays for Low Band Receiving, w5znjoel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Low 160m dple - trash or treasure?, Bill Lederer |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: Low 160m dple - trash or treasure?, Roger Kennedy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |