To: | "paul ecker" <eckerpw@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Tuning 160M Dipole |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:04:54 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
>paul ecker wrote: > > > I put up a 160m dipole but now need to tune it. SWR at low end of band is > abt 3 and at top end abt 5. From what I have read this means I need to It works a lot better to find the frequency of minimum SWR and then it is a simple matter to calculate how much to prune. For example, if the frequency is 10% too low, say 1647 kHz, then remove 10% of the wire to move to 1830 kHz. Merely knowing the SWR at 1830 kHz doesn't tell you with any precision how much wire to remove. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: dipole height, Rick Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: wire for a provisory beverage, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Tuning 160M Dipole, Ulrich Weiss |
Next by Thread: | Topband: FW: Tuning 160M Dipole, Peter Voelpel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |