To: | wb6rse1@mac.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Sun, 8 May 2011 08:54:35 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
wb6rse1@mac.com wrote: > the Pixel design. The technology is based on work done by Dr. Carl E. Baum > in the mid '60s through the early '70s. A list of papers complied by Dr. My reading of Baum's papers is that the so-called Moebius loop has 4 times the output impedance of a single turn loop and 1/4 of the bandwidth of a single turn loop. If the object is to get broadband coverage, can someone tell me why a Moebius loop is supposed to be better than a single turn loop? Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop, wb6rse1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop, Rick Karlquist |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop, wb6rse1 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Pixel Technologies Magnetic RX Loop, Rick Karlquist |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |