UX2X was a solid S9 in FL during then entire evening. UW2M, UX1UA were S8.
Never heard US1S.
(TX antenna only.)
73 and HNY,
George,
AA7JV
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 04:49:23 +0200
uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net> wrote:
UX1UA, UR0MC, UX2X -these are stations with good real RX antennas.
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Bill Weaver писал 2019-12-31 04:40:
I have him and UX2X in the log, but I'm in eastern zone 4 (central
Ky). Most of west and central EU was easily workable here.
73,
Bill WE5P
On Dec 30, 2019 at 21:29, uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
wrote:
Hi All The US1Q station (EM2Q in ARRL 160) announced an unrealistic result :
https://www.kkn.net/stew/STEWSCR.TXT This station is located in the south-east of Ukraine.
This is a very poor geographic location for working with NA. Compare US1Q results with
UX1UA, UR0MC, UX2X results. Especially regarding the work with the 3rd zone! They say that
evidence is needed .... But how to prove that white is white, and black is black? Why are
all new technologies (WEBsdr and more) helping only dishonest people? And the truth has no
protection? Is it possible to live like that ?? -- Nick, UY0ZG
https://www.kkn.net/stew/STEWSCR.TXT <http://www.topband.in.ua> _________________
Searchable Archives: https://www.kkn.net/stew/STEWSCR.TXT
<http://www.contesting.com/_topband> - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|