Mike,
One thing that I used to do is put a 80M trap between the top of the vertical
and the L wire to use it on two bands. I know yours is not guyed and can’t
support top weight. Mine was the same; here is how I approached it.
If two supports are available, in my case a high tower support and a lower tree
support, I run the wire sloping down rom the high support to a bit past the
vertical, insulate it, and then run rope to the lower support so the wire is
secure on its own. I then attach a floating wire from the top of the vertical
up to the L wire. No torque on the vertical, in fact, it is even a bit held in
place. Of course, you need to lower the wire to fold over the vertical, but
that is easily done.
Just a thought if you happen to have the needed supports.
73,
Drew K3PA
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:33:41 -0700
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 160 vertical/L
Message-ID: <37bd96b0-0f95-3f03-7e76-be1ff2901795@w0mu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I have a full sized 80m vertical and a Top loaded Cushcraft 33ft vertical for
160. The Cushcraft gets out but not great.
I was thinking about using an inverted L over the radial field that I use for
the 160. It is 30ish radials of various lengths or I have seen where people
have loaded the 80m vertical on 160. I think I recall people are not overly
excited about bottom loading the 80. The 80 is unguyed so the top cannot
support anything.
I can get the vertical part of the L up 50-60 feet.
Any feelings one way or another? I can make a switching system for the
80 vert if people think this is a reasonable transmitting solution. I have a
rcv array, so I am hoping to improve my xmit signal.
W0MU
------------------------------
***********************************
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|