Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] A new (?) tower design

To: "Gary K9GS" <GaryK9GS@wi.rr.com>,"'Tower Talk'" <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] A new (?) tower design
From: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:24:00 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
TT:

     When I look at the photo, I see the installer atop the second INSTALLED
section, fixing the pulley to the top of the INSTALLED section, with the
third yet-to-be-installed section sitting on the ground in the foreground of
the photo.  The fellow would have to be pretty foolish to be standing on the
section for which he's about to release the only support it's got - the
pulley cable!

73 de
Gene Smar  AD3F

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary K9GS" <GaryK9GS@wi.rr.com>
To: "'Tower Talk'" <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] A new (?) tower design


> Hi John,
>
> Take a look here:  http://www.onemantowers.com/photopage1.html
>
> About 1/3-1/2 half way down the page on the left, right above the caption
:
>
> "Attaching the cable pulley to the top of the section. This step is
repeated
> for each section as it is placed".
>
> The forces on the build-in lifting trolley with someone climbing on the
> offset section have got to be pretty significant.  Then again, the
> welding/tower looks pretty beefy.  This is when you trust that the guy
doing
> the welding wasn't coming back from a lunch which includes Fosters :)
>
> On the other hand, this does look like a pretty good idea that bears
> watching.
>
> 73,
>  Gary
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   K9GS
>   Gary Schwartz           email: k9gs@arrl.net
>   Check out K9NS on the web    http://www.qsl.net/k9ns/
>   Society of Midwest Contesters (SMC)     GMDXA
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John [N5BSD]" <n5bsd@rblprd.com>
> To: "'Tower Talk'" <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 02:07 AM
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] A new (?) tower design
>
>
> Uhh, which picture did you see someone on the offset section??
>
> I have been thru that site a few dozen times.
>
> And they are trying to reduce inventory in California BTW
> Decent price break, hi hi
>
> But I have yet to see someone on an offset section of tower
>
> 73
> John
> N5BSD / NNN0OYH
> ARRL NTS ORS NTX Digital
> www.n5bsd.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jack Berry
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 6:49 PM
> To: Alan Beagley; Tower Talk
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] A new (?) tower design
>
>
> No, but it looks like an interesting alternative to the Hazers. Climbing
out
> on the offset section during construction looks a little flakey.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with
any
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>