Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.

To: "'Jim Brown'" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>,<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:11:18 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Sorry Jim, but I am not arguing. I fully agree with what you said and I
understand about cable loss.

I had unintentionally thought that the other Jim had posted what you had and
mixed the two in my last post.

My whole point that I was making is that swr does not change at different
points on the line as impedance does when there is a mismatch, except for
losses in the line, as I said in my very first post on the subject.

73
Gary  K4FMX


> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 11:06 PM
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Carolina Windom, etc.
> 
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:15:37 -0500, Gary Schafer wrote:
> 
> >It seems Jim is still saying that the impedance mismatch transforms the
> swr
> >from one end to the other here. Also note that there is no mention of
> line
> >loss either.
> 
> NO. I didn't say that.
> 
> Gary, instead of arguing, I suggest that you study the ARRL Antenna Book
> or any
> textbook on transmission lines. I'm quite sure of what I wrote in my
> previous
> post. It was true when I learned in in Engineering school in 1963, and
> it's still
> true!
> 
> 73,
> 
> Jim K9YC
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>