BUT with 2 thrust bearings, that SHOUL be minimal anyway. Mark AA6DX
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
To: "reflector -tower" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] (no subject)
> Yeah, seems a waste to me. The only advantage would be to reduce side
> force on the rotor by increasing the length of it's side of the lever.
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> > bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Julio Peralta
> > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:45
> > To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
> > Subject: [TowerTalk] (no subject)
> >
> > What is the purpose of putting a rotor 20 to 25' below the top of the
> > tower. It seems a waste of expensive mast material to me.
> >
> > Julio, W4HY
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|