Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[Towertalk] (no subject)

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [Towertalk] (no subject)
From: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:48:23 -0500
Zac:

     Check out www.trylon.com  for construction details such as total
weight, foundation design, etc.  For my Trylon T500-64 (64-foot tall, 45
sqft wind area) the sections ranged in weight from 155 pounds to about 70
pounds.

73 de
Gene Smar  AD3F
-----Original Message-----
From: Zac Smith <sk-8-er@clnk.com>
To: towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] (no subject)


>how much do the sections weigh?
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <K7LXC@aol.com>
>To: <sparks@apk.net>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:07 AM
>Subject: Re: [Towertalk] (no subject)
>
>
>> In a message dated 3/25/02 6:56:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>sparks@apk.net
>> writes:
>>
>> > I'm considering a 96 ft self-supporting Trylon tower.  To maintain a
>> >  semi-peaceful relationship with my neighbors, I'm considering locating
>it
>> in
>> > my
>> >  woods.  I have a small clearing in a good spot, and I'm willing to cut
>a
>> few
>> >  more trees down if I need to.  Trees are 50-70ft, and all of my RF
>would
>> be
>> > VHF  and above to 10GHz.
>> >
>> >  I've considered some of the annoyances of this such as difficulty of
>> getting
>> >  concrete back there for the base,
>>
>>     Piece of cake. Just hire a line pump (truck mounted concrete pumper).
>> They're reasonably priced ($4-500) and can pump up to 400 feet. Option #2
>is
>> to use one of those powered buggies - they're even cheaper but more work.
>>
>> >  the need to erect w/o a crane,
>>
>>     Another piece of cake. With two guys on the tower you can build it on
>the
>> tower like an erector set. You can do 56 feet a day easy.
>>
>> >  feedline losses, etc, and I think I can overcome/tolerate them.
>> >
>> >  Has anyone ever put a tower in the woods?  Love it?  Regret it?  What
>am I
>> > not thinking about?
>>
>>     The only negative would be the attenuation from trees/wet leaves at
>the
>> frequencies you mentioned but there's not much you can do about that.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Steve     K7LXC
>> TOWER TECH -
>> Professional tower work for amateurs
>> _______________________________________________
>> Towertalk mailing list
>> Towertalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>_______________________________________________
>Towertalk mailing list
>Towertalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>