This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_005F_01BEE5DC.7AA74160
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
HI
I am putting up an XM240 and was wondering what the group felt about use =
of the Cushcraft current Balun vs using a coaxial Balun as on the old 40 =
2CD
Thanks
Al WD8PKF
------=_NextPart_000_005F_01BEE5DC.7AA74160
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>HI</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I am putting up an XM240 and was wondering what the =
group felt=20
about use of the Cushcraft current Balun vs using a coaxial Balun as on =
the old=20
40 2CD</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2> Thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Al WD8PKF</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_005F_01BEE5DC.7AA74160--
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|