Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls

To: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>, <Lew@dsl-only.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls
From: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:18:38 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I don't think the way pointy things on towers might work is at all contrary to 
established charge behavior. Quite the contrary. Maybe I just think of charge 
behavior differently than others would, I don't know.  But in any case I would 
not think of arguing theory with you Tom, you've probably forgotten more than 
I'll ever know about electronic theory. Seriously.

I take all the opinions and anecdotal stuff on lightning behavior with a grain 
of salt. It's interesting, but so far I haven't seen much that's really 
definitive about lightning behavior. So I just relax and enjoy the discussions. 
I'm glad that some things, even today, remain pretty much a mystery, to be 
pondered and analyzed and discussed as we do here. There's some strange and 
wonderful stuff going on out there, ya know.

What's REALLY important and what there is plenty of real evidence for, is that 
a PROPER grounding system is essential... and can really work... to minimize 
the adverse effects when Ma Nature does send her forces to visit.  Polyphaser 
and ICE and maybe a few others describe methods and provide products that work 
a lot of the time. I don't think there's a lot of disagreement here about the 
main principles and practices of damage mitigation.

I do have a Single Point Ground system. I don't have a pointy thing on top of 
my tower. But it's fun to participate in the endless speculative discussion of 
what might possibly go on BEFORE the strike...

73,  Jerry K3BZ



----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tom Rauch 
  To: Jerry Keller ; Lew@dsl-only.net 
  Cc: 'Towertalk Reflector' 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:42 AM
  Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls


  Jerry,

  If someone chooses to believe something contrary to
  established charge behavior is at work here, then that is
  their choice. My choice is to side with the data that shows
  there is no difference, both in how the gaps behave and what
  Polyphaser and others (like the frequency of lightning hits
  near towers data) shows.

  Anything anyone wants to do at their house is fine with me.
  The facts we have available, however, show what they show.

  For me, this has been very educational. I found the actual
  data and links to data that were presented here interesting
  and educational.

  73 Tom


  _______________________________________________

  See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

  _______________________________________________
  TowerTalk mailing list
  TowerTalk@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>