All.
A local mentioned to me his Tribander was broken and he’d been using his 40m
4-square on 20m…something I had never tried.
Today I tried feeding 20m RF into my 40m 4-square. The SWR was too high to
appease my amplifier with much more than 350watts out, the amp would kick out.
I suspect it would’ve eventually gone up higher as the dump resistor (dummy
load) outside heated up, so I quit after a few transmissions. Might’ve worked
fed through an antenna tuner….not sure.
The strange thing is….on some signals (USA mostly, as I did this late
afternoon)….the 40m 4-square actually was stronger on 20m receive than the
proper 20m 4-square.
I am not sure whether to put this down to arrival angles to/fr the Ionosphere,
beam direction (QTF) or a poorly working 20m 4-square. My 20m array never
seems to be as loud on 20m as others in the area using tribanders. (I’ve done
hundreds of comparisons using the RBN post-contest) The previous owner told me
the same.
There was quite a noticeable difference on some signals, but exactly equal on
others.
I heard a Missouri station CQing a good long while and he was a good S-unit
louder on the 40m 4-square, as he CQ’d away on 14MHz. The MO stn was
~2300km/1425mi from here (ie: 1 x F2 hop more or less)
I tried changing beam directions on the 40m array and couldn’t get a good sense
of what the pattern was like on 20m….mostly there was no big change in signal
strength but I didn’t play with it for very long.
I also tried feeding 20m rf into my 80m 4-square, where the SWR was better, but
signals were obviously weaker using the 80m unit on 20m. I have used my 160m
inverted L on various higher bands when antennas were broken here. About the
same results.
Anyways…just a data point or two. Strange as it was.
Mike VE9AA
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|