Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier for ROHN SSV. Pad and Pier Foundations

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier for ROHN SSV. Pad and Pier Foundations
From: "Paul" <paul.reiter@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Paul <paul.reiter@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:05:43 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I can relate my experience with San Diego county's engineers from last 
Wednesday. They won't accept any PE drawings without a "wet stamp", meaning it 
was just done and bears the original signed and dated seal from the engineer. 
In addition, they won't go for anything other than a CA engineer...after 
looking around for weeks, I was unable to find one to even touch my project for 
less than $5-10 grand. Finally I gave up trying to install a Trylon tower (made 
in Canada), and went to US Tower in Visalia. There, I could get the PE drawings 
from their engineer for $350. so long as I was installing a UST. So I opted to 
spend five times more money on the tower, got a crank up, and used their 
engineer. UST mentioned they can do a wet stamp drawing for every state in the 
union. Amazing, and real customer service!

When I went back to have my interview last Wednesday with the county engineer, 
he was the most concerned with the tower base. The rebar, concrete and like 
that. Certainly, we don't have ice here, so he didn't bother with that. The 
drawings were for a 70 mph wind zone, in normal soil, and he was satisfied that 
the calculations were based on those parms. His comment to me was that these 
drawings were far, far, superior to the others I had submitted for the Trylon 
tower, which came from Karl Tashjian, and they did not like them AT ALL, and 
that is why they would not entertain any plans done by him. 

Incidentally, I am not bashful about my distaste for the way Karl Tashjian does 
business, which is not at all. Stay away from him. 90% of the time, he did not 
respond to any form of communication, and when he did it was in grunts and one 
liners. He's got a real piss-poor attitude, treats his customers like 
you-know-what, and (this is not coming from me) every other engineer who looked 
at his PE drawings, said they were absolutely inadequate, incomplete, and 
unprofessional. Not to mention I waited weeks and weeks and weeks for the 
slightest modification. When I got them, the modifications were in pencil. 
Unacceptable to the county, of course. Ridiculous.

Your experience may vary from mine. Suffice it to say, it still took 10 trips 
at 1 1/2 hours drive each way, to get it done, but I have the permit in hand 
now. It only cost $270 for the permit. Ha.

My Erection begins soon.

Paul
WY7I
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Lux 
  To: isp@bnjcomp.com ; towertalk 
  Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 8:24 AM
  Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier for ROHN SSV. Pad and Pier Foundations


  At 07:42 AM 7/9/2005, isp@bnjcomp.com wrote:

  >Of couse like everyone else here on this list that puts up thier own tower 
  >I am trying to save money.  But also trying to stay safe.   The property I 
  >am putting this on was originally part of a piece of land that was hopeful 
  >that the city would get a large business to be on.  So for that reason 
  >they did core samples of the property.  So I am going to try to acquire a 
  >copy of the results of those core samples to see what they say.   So my 
  >question is I don't see in Rohn's book a spot for "if XXX sandy conditions 
  >then modify piers by doing this or that"  or "if XXX compactness with clay 
  >then modify piers by doing this or that".

  In general, the mfr won't provide this level of detail.  If you're going to 
  modify the "standard" installation, especially for a tower costing tens of 
  thousands of dollars, they're going to expect that you have an engineer who 
  can do the calculations for your local situation.  You have to take into 
  account not only the bearing strength of the soil, the details of the 
  excavation/compaction method, and local regulatory stuff.  Rohn can't be 
  expected to know all the idiosyncracies of every building department and 
  soil type.

  On the other hand, a local engineer can probably crank this sort of thing 
  out, along with all the other structural calculations in 10-20 hours at a 
  $100/hr or so, and an engineer's report would probably be required by the 
  building department anyway.  That's probably <10% of the cost of the 
  overall job, considering the new cost of the tower, the excavation, the 
  permitting, etc., especially if you treat it like a business, and you 
  actully figure in the cost of labor for digging the holes, etc.



  >  Once I get that where do I look for those modifications.  Also I tried 
  > when I bought this tower to get engineering drawings from ROHN but after 
  > MANY calls was unsuccessful.  Does anyone have any new experience with 
  > new radian / rohn and think my ability to get those drawings would be 
  > better?  Better question is it seems all the information is in the
  >  Rohn Catalog and I am wondering what I will get off of those drawings 
  > that is not in the catalog (since the drawings will probable be for the 
  > original owners Soil conditions).?

  You're talking about engineering drawings prepared for a specific 
  installation?  I'm not surprised that you couldn't get a copy. In some 
  cases, the drawings remain the property of the engineer/architect who 
  prepared them.  In others, they are owned by the person who paid for the 
  analysis.

    In any case, the drawings may not be of much use to you in a practical 
  sense.  As you say, they would be for a different installation, so you 
  couldn't use them for your installation.  They might be interesting to look 
  at in an "understanding how the engineering analysis is done" sense, but 
  you certainly couldn't just plug in your numbers and hope to trust the 
  results.  A lot of times, there's a goodly element of professional 
  judgement in the analysis and drawings, and most engineers don't put ALL 
  the gotchas into the analysis.  Example: Engineers in San Diego probably 
  don't even bother doing the ice loading calculations, or even mentioning 
  that they didn't do them.  The local building department isn't looking for 
  them, the odds of icing occurring are so small that the engineer can be 
  comfortable (in a professional responsibility sense) not mentioning them, etc.

  I am certainly leery of people who ask me for copies of drawings I've done, 
  and want to know a WHOLE lot about why they want them.  The last thing I'd 
  want is someone to photocopy some drawings I've done (without my knowing 
  and approving), submit them for their permit, have the counter person not 
  worry about it not having an original wetstamp, have a disaster, and find 
  out about it when the legal summons shows up in my mailbox.  I'd prevail in 
  the long run, but it would be expensive and time consuming.


  _______________________________________________

  See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

  _______________________________________________
  TowerTalk mailing list
  TowerTalk@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>