> This has been done often in the past:
>
> put a transverter for your particular band AT the antenna and use
> cheaper coax to run to your HF rig.
I thought about that on 144 and 440 with the power amps and pre-amps. Then I
thought about how many times the tower gets hit by lightning per year. Then
I thought about how many times I'd probably have to repair said amps let
alone climb up to get them and climb back up to put them back in service. I
decided the coax was both easier and cheaper in the long run. However you
may not be quite the lightning target my system seems to be.
I'd really like to put one of my duo-band 144/440 colinear verticals right
on top, but I think that'd be pushing my luck as much as standing on top of
the tower using "sign language" during a heavy thunderstorm
Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member)
N833R - World's oldest Debonair CD-2
www.rogerhalstead.com
>
> Don
> N8DE
>
> Craig Thompson wrote:
>
>>I am considering a low loss coax for VHF and UHF on a 90 foot motorized
>>tower. It has to be flexible, high power and low loss. I found a 1 1/4"
>>coax by RFS RFS UCF114-50JA. It is not cheap. Has anyone had any
>>experience with this cable? I have used LMR600UF but it is too lossy for
>>EME up to 1296. Do you have any other suggestions?
>>
>>Thanks, Craig
>>K9CT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|