Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please

To: "Tom Jednacz" <tjednacz@ieee.org>, "FCG" <fcg@kkn.net>,<Towertalk@contesting.com>, <RCARIELLO@si.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 05:42:35 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> Government, commercial and military customers will replace
their log
> periodic antennas with the SteppIR as soon as they learn
about the
> performance improvement. Covering all frequencies at
higher gain at each
> frequency with four elements and low SWR instead of 20
elements is a good
> deal both cost and performance.

Perhaps they will, but I doubt it.

The log retains the advantage of wide bandwidth and no
tuning time. Keep in mind commercial installations also
don't use little toy logs. They generally have large
antennas that last for many many years and have much longer
booms with many more elements per band.

73 Tom




_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>