Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Verticals of Rohn 25

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Verticals of Rohn 25
From: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 20:29:27 -0700
No, but it's essentially useless (wasted resources) for the purpose you 
intended it for.
Send your fax # or snail mail address to my work e-mail address
and I'll send you an article about it.
<bobwanderer@polyphaser.com>
73, Bob AA0CY

----------
From:  Chuck Dietz[SMTP:ke5fi@wt.net]
Sent:  Tuesday, April 22, 1997 1:01 PM
To:  K7LXC@aol.com
Cc:  btippett@hub.infoave.net; Towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:  Re: [TowerTalk] Verticals of Rohn 25

K7LXC@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 97-04-22 04:51:12 EDT, ke5fi@wt.net (Chuck Dietz (KE5FI))
> writes:
> 
> > I just run a wire down the length of the tower...
> 
>       Conventional wisdom for tower lightning protection discourages this
> technique.  The two parallel conductors represent possible voltage potential
> differences and possible arcing. 

It is taped to the tower on the way down.  I doubt there would be much
potential difference.  ?

Chuck, KE5FI

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>