| To: | "towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Fall Report |
| From: | "Wilson" <infomet@embarqmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Wilson <infomet@embarqmail.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Dec 2015 16:21:12 -0500 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
WOW, great report! But incomplete. Was there a missing step AFTER the accident? If broken during this accident, there would have been some shiny failure surface, not seen. And what’s the source of energy to send it 62’ HORIZONTALLY? http://wirelessestimator.com/content/articles?pagename=Tower%20Climber%20Lawsuit We should just make a simple law: If you hit the ground not attached to a broken lanyard or failed harness, then you have no claim. WL _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] tower spacing, Grant Saviers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Time for a Real Tower Question TX-489, K6OK via TowerTalk |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] tower spacing, w5jmw |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Time for a Real Tower Question TX-489, K6OK via TowerTalk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |