Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Tower loading... again...

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tower loading... again...
From: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:23:59 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I am sure this has been covered many times over... if there is an article or 
three please let me know the url...
meanwhile:

I have read many times over how people REALLY seriously overload their towers - 
stacks on R25, HUGE
 arrays on R45... is it indeed that the designs are THAT conservative!? 

I am in SE Arizona - near the city of Sierra Vista. I want to put up ~134' of 
R45 - with a RTS rotor at ~37', an
 RTS guy ring at 77' and 117' and the top of the tower (still R45) at about 
134'. I was thinking of a stack of M2 
4EL 20's (35' boom) at 118 and about 78'. But I love 75/80. Would this tower 
handle a 2EL 80 meter beam at 
the top (134')? 

I was thinking of the Force12 280S (58' elements, 18' "T" bars and a 36' boom) 
or maybe even the 
280Magnum (76' elements, 26' T-bars and a 44' boom)... 

[also - I have not tried to contact F12 - yet - I have however read they may be 
in "trouble"? Calls going 
unreturned, product not being delivered... I would not want to promote rumors 
but are they still healthy?]

g.
K9RX

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>